Not Since 2000

NEW-TO-DnD_What-is-DnD_Subsection_Hero_140718
  It's been a long time since I've bothered to purchase an official Dungeons & Dragons product.  Since the debut of third edition in 2000, there has been nothing that WOTC has produced that has interested me, as the game is not the D&D that i know and love.  I have never been able to make that leap.  I like my D&D old school, thank you very much.  I haven't paid much attention to the new 5th edition, but tonight I downloaded the basic rules to see what the new version is like.  That's when I ran across this...
Finding a Hidden Object When your character searches for a hidden object such as a secret door or a trap, the DM typically asks you to make a Wisdom (Perception) check. Such a check can be used to find hidden details or other information and clues that you might otherwise overlook. In most cases, you need to describe where you are looking in order for the DM to determine your chance of success. For example, a key is hidden beneath a set of folded clothes in the top drawer of a bureau. If you tell the DM that you pace around the room, looking at the walls and furniture for clues, you have no chance of finding the key, regardless of your Wisdom (Perception) check result. You would have to specify that you were opening the drawers or searching the bureau in order to have any chance of success.
  Why in the world would you need to roll for a perception check to find a key "hidden" under some folded clothes?  If you searched the drawers, I'd rule that you found it, period.
  Next I came across the spell lists, and that's when my jaw just hit the ground.  Here's the list of Magic-User ( sorry, it's now Wizard) cantrips.  Remember cantrips, those useless little spells you used for about a week before realizing they were pointless?
Cantrips (0 Level) Acid Splash, Dancing Lights, Fire Bolt, Light, Mage Hand, Minor Illusion, Poison Spray, Prestidigitation, Ray of Frost, Shocking Grasp 
And these are just the cantrips, three of which can be cast by a 1st level wizard!  And it gets even worse...
  You prepare the list of wizard spells that are available for you to cast. To do so, choose a number of wizard spells from your spellbook equal to your Intelligence modifier + your wizard level (minimum of one spell). The spells must be of a level for which you have spell slots. For example, if you’re a 3rd-level wizard, you have four 1st-level and two 2nd-level spell slots. With an Intelligence of 16, your list of prepared spells can include six spells of 1s or 2nd level, in any combination, chosen from your spellbook.
  I had to read that a few times just to make sure I was understanding it correctly.  Six second level spells for a 3rd level wizard, plus three "cantrips"?! 
  This is still not the D&D I know and love.

Appendix N, The Elfstones Of Shannara By Terry Brooks

elfstones
  Thirty years ago, when I was but a lad of fourteen years, I believed this novel was truly an amazing work of fiction.  Unlike Tolkien, where the writing seemed to plod along, and the inclusion of songs seemed totally pointless, Terry Brooks' writings were dynamic and magical, and I found it nearly impossible to set the book down until I had reached the conclusion.
  Thirty years later, and those lofty opinions have come down to the ground floor of adult reality.  The same style and qualities I found so intriguing as a teenager are what now makes this only an average fantasy story at best. 
  The actions of Wil and Amberle move along not by their fierce determination to complete their quest, but only by the repeated (and repeated, and repeated, and repeated...) fortuitous intervention of strangers and minor characters.
  The story of Ander has a little depth, and the battles between the Elven army and the demons is well told.  I had a lot of trouble identifying with or caring for the protagonists, and it's because of the juvenile world view this book is written from.  The trials and tribulations of the characters are the same things, albeit less fantastical, that teenagers and young adults face as they enter the real world of work, family, and responsibility.
  If you're of that age, then the book will probably resonate strongly with you, and be meaningful to your own journey through life.  If you are like me, a little further down the road of life, this can be a nice look back at the path behind you, but not much more.  Let your son, daughter, niece or nephew find delight in the pages, and remember that you were just like that once.

Pandora's Dice Wheel

  Over the years there have been many alternatives to using dice to generate random numbers.  The Holmes Edition of D&D was famous for it's use of chits, due to the Great Dice Shortage of the late 1970's.  Plastered in every issue of Dragon Magazine I used to own were ads for the Dragonbone Electronic Dice Wand, which one of the players in our group actually owned.  It just wasn't, of course, as nice as using actual dice, and it only made a brief appearance in our games.
Dragonbonead
  Nowadays you can download virtual dice rollers for your desktop, smartphone and tablet, and there's even one that mimics the Dragonbone perfectly, called Dungeonbone.  There is another replacement for dice that had ads in Dragon magazine, but I've never seen one.  It's called Pandora's Dice Wheel.
PandorasDiceWheel1
PandoraDiceWheel2
  What's interesting is that it has a very tactile component, turning the wheel, and the lack of a tactile component to most dice replacements is usually the main reason they're not used too much.  I wonder if spinning the wheel is just as satisfying as rolling the bones?  Anyone ever use one of these?

Holmes Basic, Page By Page Part 3

  We've come to the title page on our journey through Holmes D&D, and my version of the manuscript is the third edition from December 1979.  According to the Zenopus Archives, my copy is the first printing of the third edition, and there are nine known printing runs, which is a testament to the popularity of the original Basic Set.  There are several changes made between editions, and I'll try to highlight these as we go along.
Title page
  The illustration on the title page is by David C. Sutherland III, and in my opinion it may just be the finest piece of old school D&D art ever created.  Blasphemy, I know, as Sutherland is widely considered a distant third to the likes of Trampier and Otus, but before you rile the local villagers into a frenzied mob to destroy my laboratory of obvious evil, hear me out.
  Composition wise is where everything goes wrong, and right at the same time.  You almost can't see the cleric (armor and mace, looks like a cleric to me) smiting the vile pig-faced orcs with extreme prejudice, as the fighter obscures most of the that action.  The wizard's spell also fades into the background, and is covered up by the cleric's mace.  There's so much going on, and everything gets in everything else's way.  But, if we look beyond the obvious flaws, there's more going on here than at first appears.
  We have three characters facing off against a horde of orcs, at least 18 by my count, and probably more that we can't see.  Two orcs are already dead, with a third apparently wounded enough he's having trouble getting up.  Notice the wounded fellows shield.  It's been through a beating, and shows signs of distress, unlike all the other shields wielded by orcs. 
  The characters have positioned themselves defensively, ready for a fighting withdrawal up the stairs, a tactic that has reduced the orcs numerical advantage.  The wizard has ascended the stairs so he can fire over the front rank, and is using that column as partial cover!  He's also firing into the middle ranks, helping to disrupt their charge.  These are players who know how to use tactics to their benefit.
  Dungeons and Dragons is a thinking man's game.  Brute strength alone will not win the day, one must use their wits to survive and prosper.  Sutherland has encapsulated that concept into the art, and that's his great strength as an artist, no matter how simple his drawings may appear. 

Appendix N, The Maze Of Peril By John Eric Holmes

51il4Qa XKL   If you're perusing this blog post, there's a great chance that you're an aficionado of old-school Dungeons & Dragons, or at the very least you have a burning curiosity towards the forty year old game of paper, pencils, funny dice, and your imagination.  That, or you Googled your way here and are desperately looking for your browser's back button.
  Assuming you're not here by accident or quirk of fate, (and if you are, why not stick around for a little bit.  Coffee?) think back to the times before you knew what a mortgage truly was, before the magic of utility bills, taking the little ones to little league, and  mandatory overtime dominated your days.  When you and your friends could devote all evening to pillaging the Caves of Chaos.  Back when you named your half-elf fighter/magic-user Melric (a combination of Merlin and Elric that you were sure no one ever thought of before).  The times you equipped a halfling thief with a grappling hook, and made sure to utilize said hook in every....  single....  encounter, gleefully shouting "Bonzai" all the while.  (No, I don't know why the night watch was not amused when you used the grappling hook to scale the city wall, after being granted permission to enter the gates.  Explaining that it was the thief-ly way to make a grand entrance probably didn't smooth things over, either.)
  Now take these (mis)adventures and employ them as the basis for a 147 page novella, and the end result would most likely resemble The Maze Of Peril by John Eric Holmes.  That is not a negative criticism.  On the contrary, it's the somewhat juvenile style of writing and assorted D&D-isms that give this work it's charm.  Holmes made sure not to take anything too seriously, and you get the sense that the campaign this book was based on was about, first and foremost, having fun, not being epic.
  The main protagonists are Zereth (I was Drizzt before Drizzt was Drizzt) the elf and Boinger (yes, Boinger!  I shit you not!) the halfling.  Their compatriots along the way run the gamut of fantasy tropes, from a portly priest and a knightly paladin, to a gruff dwarf and an alluring Amazon.  We're even treated to a segment where a centaur joins the party for a short while.
  If you can't take your fantasy literature with a grain of absurdity, then this is not the book for you.  If, on the other hoof (or paw or hand or mandible) you don't mind getting your peanut butter mixed with your centaurs and your centaurs mixed with your peanut butter, you will most likely enjoy the story and the memories of games past it can evoke.
  But wait, there's more!
  This novella is also an excellent snapshot of the way D&D was played back in the dark ages of the 1970's and early '80's.  There are lessons aplenty for students of the Old Ways, both players and dungeon masters alike.  Just the twists and turns around the flesh golem subplot is golden old-school-iness, and a great lesson on how actions can have unexpected consequences for the players.  What are you waiting for?  You can but it at Noble Knight Games

Holmes Basic, Page By Page, Part 2

  Onward in our journey into Holmes Basic, we come to something that was never meant to be there, the cardboard insert with chits, provided because of a lack of available polyhedral dice.  My copy has the insert, but the chits are no longer there.  Here's a scan of the insert, including a coupon to get a free set of dice (a $1.50 retail value, please allow 4 to 6 weeks for delivery).  

dice1
  When Holmes Basic was published, 1977 to 1980, polyhedral dice were something of a novelty, and TSR had some trouble maintaining a steady supply.  Many of the Basic Boxed Sets came without dice, and so a cardboard insert was added with cut-out chits to take the place of dice.  Instructions were provided on their use (see the pictures above) which also included how to use the dice once you had them. 
 dice3
  Strangely for a set that was aimed towards beginners, John Eric Holmes provided no details on how these funny little pieces of polyhedral plastic were to be used.  The d20 was marked 0 to 9 twice, and was to be used as a d20, d10 and d%, but how was one new to the hobby supposed to know that?  It's a glaring mistake on JEH's part, and TSR, and details on the dice had to be added to the back of the last page, plus on the chit insert.  

The Fantasy Factory

 

  Oh SciFi Channel, how you are missed.  We used to get interesting programs like Masters Of Fantasy, now we just get schlock like Sharknado Week. Focusing on TSR just before the purchase by Wizards Of The Coast, it's nice to see Gary, but wow is there a lot of screen time devoted to Lorraine Williams.  She really never did get it when it came to Dungeons & Dragons, and you can see it when she speaks.

  I've never seen the TSR offices until now, a nice little snapshot of what used to be.  It would have been nice to see some of Gary's basement where everything began!  Too bad, also, that Dave Arneson was not included.

Holmes Basic, Page By Page, Part 1

  My introduction to Dungeons and Dragons was through the classic B/X sets in 1981.  There was a dim realization that an earlier version of the game existed, but I only caught a glimpse it once before the advent of the interwebs.  I think it would be fun and informative to look over the Holmes version of the rules,  something I've never really had a chance to do before.  Thanks to the magic of Ebay, I have a nice copy of Holmes'  rulebook, though it didn't come with the box.

tumblr_nny2i6G3mc1qzfsnio2_r1_1280
 
  As in anything, you should always start at the beginning, this being the box itself.  The dimensions of the box are just about identical to my beloved B/X versions, and it's a kind of Golden Ratio for old-school goodness.  For gamers older than I am who started with the LBB's, it may not evoke the same feelings, but for me, anything that comes in that size box just feels right

  The cover artwork, while not as powerful as Erol Otus' masterpiece on the 1981 Basic Set box, does what it is supposed to, namely pique your interest and depict what the game is succinctly.  We have a dungeon, a dragon, treasure, and a pair of (outclassed, it seems) adventurers.  The work is by David C. Sutherland III, and is one of his better pieces, though even his lesser works still speak to me more than most contemporary fantasy art.

  More to come...

   Bonus!  Here's a full-size version of the box artwork without the text!  Enjoy!

HolmesBasic_boxcover

Back To 1981


  Let's get this blog back in business!  We'll start with a commercial for the 1981 D&D Basic Set (Click Here for a higher quality version. Embedding disabled for this one, WTF).  

  Now my memory may be a little fuzzy, but I sure don't remember a dragon in the Caves of Chaos, do you? And really, could the players and DM be any nerdier?  Probably not, as this group (except for the girls.... where were these women when I was growing up?  Not at our table!) was just about spot on for the group of friends I played with at the time.

  Funny how the commercial makes the statement that your options are limited, fight or run away.  Kinda defeats the whole point of using your imagination, because I can think of several other options.  It is nice, though, that running away is mentioned, as you would never hear this in a commercial for a current RPG (Run away?  But I'm the hero of this story!).

  I think "USE YOUR LIGHTNING BOLT" is going to be the war cry for an NPC my players are going to meet, just to mess with them!

Bomber Inspiration

Artist renderings based on the Kalinin K-7 bomber that was not successful.  That third one shows it outfitted with several cannons! Would make an interesting post-apocalyptic relic, a flying "dungeon" that got caught in some kind of time warp for D&D, etc.

Inspirational Scene


Inspirational scene for Gamma World, any Supers game, even spy games like Top Secret.

Tournament of Dragons

  Finally have the time and motivation to blog again, and I'm going to restart the tournament of dragons, so get your vote in.  So here we go...
Dragon #350
Dragon #14
  This week is Issue #350 versus Issue #14.  Which cover do you prefer?  Vote in the sidebar poll!

Tournament of Dragons Catch-Up

So, real life intrudes and delays the Tournament of Dragons.  Here's the winners from Tuesday to Friday.
Tuesday
Dragon #222
Wednesday
Dragon #144
Thursday
Dragon #75

Friday


Dragon #25

Since this has been an off week for blogging, anyways, I'll post the next series next week instead of trying to play catch-up today.

Monday Tournament Of Dragons

Last week's winner is Issue #84.  Looks like the half-orc were-tiger got no love in the voting.




Today'scontest is between Issue #199 and Issue #72.  Is the "catfish" dragon your favorite, or the black dragon with the impossibly long tail?


Vote in the sidebar poll Monday Tournament of Dragons.

Friday Tournament Of Dragons

Last week's winner is Issue#331.  I guess being over-prepared paid off!




This week is a really tough one.  Issue #48 versus Issue #25.  Anyone know who's the artist of #25, It didn't say in my digital copy, but I'm not sure there's not some missing pages.

Dragon #48 by Phil Foglio
Dragon #25
Vote in the sidebar poll Friday Tournament of Dragons.

Thursday Tournament Of Dragons

Last week's winner is Isue #164.  Zombie ninjas, baby!
This week is Issue #75 versus Issue #211.  Summer vacation, D&D style takes on the zombie guard.  Can the zombies make it two for two?

Dragon #75 by Jack Crane
Dragon #211 by Brom
Vote in the sidebar poll Thursday Tournament of Dragons.

Wednesday Tournament Of Dragons

The winner from last Wednesday is Issue #235.
This week is Issue #144 versus Issue #189.  Too bad that #189's is only part of Peter Clarke's painting, as it really is much more impressive in totality.

Dragon #144 by Daniel R. Horne
Dragon #189 by Peter Clark
Vote in the sidebar poll Wednesday Tournament of Dragons.

Coloring The Dungeon

  So I had this weird dream two nights ago.  The internet was one huge dungeon, and each room was a different website.  I was in Grognardia when James M. realized that we were being spied upon by Illithids in the ceiling (yeah, made no sense to me either).  James decided to abandon "Grognardia Red", as he called it, for "Grognardia Blue", another room that looked the same, except for the colors.  In Grognardia Red, everything was either a shade of red, or black, and in Grognardia Blue everything was, of course,  either blue or black.

  The colors were not garish or bright, instead being very muted and subtle, and even though each room was furnished exactly the same, the color difference really affected the mood and tone.  This started me thinking of color in dungeons.  Usually shades of grey or brown, I thought of how my players would react to a room like Grognardia Red, and I think they'd be freaking out.  They'd just "know" there would have to be a reason everything was red, even if there wasn't. 

  I may have to try this out next session on a random dungeon room. 

Old School Renaissance Acronym Glossary & Dictionary

Another addition to the OSRAGD, TPK.  How in the hell did I miss that one?

TPK - Total Party Kill, where all the adventurers die in one encounter.  Usually the result of inexperienced players, incautious players, or just plain bad luck and bad dice rolls.

Suggestions are always welcome, as new acronyms are always popping up!

Tuesday Tournament of Dragons

The winner from last Tuesday is Issue #228.




It's been twenty contests so far, which brings us to the second round of eliminations for the first group.  This means Issue #14 is taking on Issue #222.

Dragon #14 by Steve Oliff
Dragon #222 b y Hung Mac
 Vote in the sidebar poll Tuesday Tournament of Dragons.

Monday Tournament Of Dragons

Last Monday's winner is Issue #188.  Apparently no one liked the werewolf, since it received zero votes.




This week it's Issue #93 versus Issue #84.  That were-tigress is so ugly I'm inclined to think she's a half-orc!

Dragon #93 by Jeff Busch
Dragon #84 "Ian Dinwood's Martian Moment" by Dean Morrissey
Vote in the sidebar poll Monday Tournament of Dragons.  Winner declared next Monday.

Mystery Dice

  I recently won some old dice on an eBay auction, and in the group were these three d8s.



  They are about 1.5 times the size of a regular Gamescience or Chessex d8, with the yellow one numbered 1-8, the orange going from 2-9, and the blue is 10-17!  Anyone know where these dice are from? 

Everything But The Kitchen Sink

  As John said in the comments...
I hope the plunderer on #331 has a companion to assist him when he falls on his back and can't get back on his feet. :)
In case you really, really want to play that guy, here's some minis made just for you!


OK, so everything plus the kitchen sink!

Friday Tournament Of Dragons

Last Friday's winner is Issue #100!  No surprise, really, as it is one of the most unique Dragon covers produced.
This week Issue #259 takes on Issue #331.  There seems to be a "sweet spot" in Dragon covers, a period where the artwork was just superb, and unfortunately both these pieces are past that point.  While they're OK, they just don't have the impact that a lot of the earlier covers do.  I wonder if people who started playing D&D later feel any different about these magazine covers?

Dragon #259, "the Campaign" by Stephen Daniele
Dragon #331 by Steve Prescott
 Vote in the sidebar poll Friday Tournament of Dragons.  Winner declared next Friday.

Thursday Tournament Of Dragons

Last Thursday's winner is Issue #63, and here I thought Larry Elmore's piece was a shoe-in!




This week's contest is Issue #164 versus Issue #22.  I'm not sure what they were thinking for Issue #22, having a drawing, miniatures, and a photograph all on the cover, but Issue #164 has zombie ninjas!  Life needs more ninjas in it!

Dragon #164 by Jim Holloway
Dragon #22
Vote in the sidebar poll marked Thursday Tournament of Dragons.  Winner declared next Thursday.
 
Blogger Templates